Categories:
-
3d 96 articles
-
animations 16 articles
-
architecture 47 articles
-
blender 98 articles
-
bédé 19 articles
-
techdrawing 24 articles
-
freecad 190 articles
-
gaming 1 articles
-
idsampa 8 articles
-
inthepress 8 articles
-
linux 57 articles
-
music 1 articles
-
nativeifc 31 articles
-
opensource 267 articles
-
orange 4 articles
-
photo 16 articles
-
projects 35 articles
-
receitas 176 articles
-
saopaulo 18 articles
-
sketches 163 articles
-
talks 25 articles
-
techdrawing 24 articles
-
textes 7 articles
-
trilhas 3 articles
-
urbanoids 1 articles
-
video 47 articles
-
webdesign 7 articles
-
works 151 articles
Archives:
-
2007 22 articles
-
2008 32 articles
-
2009 66 articles
-
2010 74 articles
-
2011 74 articles
-
2012 47 articles
-
2013 31 articles
-
2014 38 articles
-
2015 28 articles
-
2016 36 articles
-
2017 41 articles
-
2018 46 articles
-
2019 59 articles
-
2020 18 articles
-
2021 20 articles
-
2022 7 articles
-
2023 25 articles
-
2024 15 articles
Hello Yorik, and community,
Commenting post 22: Hello Yorik, and community, First, thank you and the other developers for the open and free nature of these products! I am a very new user experimenting with FreeCad 0.14. I have a frustrated history with TurboCad, going back several versions, more than a decade. Doing your initial tutorials as found under the help menu, I am beginning to become hopeful that I can use the program, and that the output will be useful. I am encouraged by the system of depiction being linked to CAM languages and dialects, as my needs are for very specific shapes with high fidelity to dimension. I will be attempting to describe profiles, on precise workplanes, and loft to solids. In TurboCad, the process was simple, if tedious, but the lofted ACIS objects had shrunken some fraction of a milimeter, and were worthless for looking for interferences with other interacting solids, not to mention being far from CAM worthy. Many carefully wrought profile produced solids with "slippage" in their dimensions. Your program has been very illuminating of the understanding of constraints, I am now curious as to how much this understanding may improve my performance on all platforms.
I have found that the wording of some of your instructions leave me a bit baffled, and that there are assumptions the the user is perhaps better informed than I am. I would like to make some editorial suggestions for some of the manual entries and tutorials. (The Golden Rectangle example left me bewildered, until I solved for it with a much simpler approach. I suspect the wikipedia recipe it refers to is now edited.) I fear that I am not a programmer, and have no power to assist with compiling and such. Where is the best address for suggestions? Thanks again for this fascinating program. I look forward to the 0.15 edition. Thanks again, Duane