Categories:
-
3d 96 articles
-
animations 16 articles
-
architecture 47 articles
-
blender 98 articles
-
bédé 19 articles
-
techdrawing 24 articles
-
freecad 183 articles
-
gaming 1 articles
-
idsampa 8 articles
-
inthepress 8 articles
-
linux 57 articles
-
music 1 articles
-
nativeifc 24 articles
-
opensource 260 articles
-
orange 4 articles
-
photo 16 articles
-
projects 35 articles
-
receitas 176 articles
-
saopaulo 18 articles
-
sketches 162 articles
-
talks 25 articles
-
techdrawing 24 articles
-
textes 7 articles
-
trilhas 3 articles
-
urbanoids 1 articles
-
video 47 articles
-
webdesign 7 articles
-
works 151 articles
Archives:
-
2007 22 articles
-
2008 32 articles
-
2009 66 articles
-
2010 74 articles
-
2011 74 articles
-
2012 47 articles
-
2013 31 articles
-
2014 38 articles
-
2015 28 articles
-
2016 36 articles
-
2017 41 articles
-
2018 46 articles
-
2019 59 articles
-
2020 18 articles
-
2021 20 articles
-
2022 7 articles
-
2023 25 articles
-
2024 7 articles
I very well appreciate the concept of gbXML but why can't the features
Commenting post 277: I very well appreciate the concept of gbXML but why can't the features of gbXML be included in IFC? Why should one have a separate format for energy & thermal analysis of a BIM model?
IFC2x3 has the provision of Structural Analysis Domain. Similarly, there can be a domain for energy & thermal analysis too. (www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/IFC2x3/TC1/html/)
If the Autodesk is interfering here too. May be We can interfere with IFC and add new parameters as per our requirement. I remember an FB post at this instance once shared by you, "One who controls the IFC, controls the Universe."
Read next:
Sooner, one will be able to model the exact virtual prototype of the
Sooner, one will be able to model the exact virtual prototype of the
Sooner, one will be able to model the exact virtual prototype of the
Sooner, one will be able to model the exact virtual prototype of the